大宋提刑官
GT Voice: Backlash against US export licensing shows futility of containing China_我的网站
一 |
Months-long American export license delays are costing the US billions in exports and eroding American market share globally, the US-China Business Council (USCBC) said in a flash survey released on Tuesday.
The survey noted that poorly calibrated US export controls weaken American companies in China, ceding market share to foreign competitors while reducing the profits available for research and development (R&D).
Designed originally to safeguard national security and serve legitimate foreign policy interests, the US export licensing system has become increasingly politicized, gradually turning into a political tool that obstructs normal economic and trade exchanges. The USCBC survey serves as a stark reminder of how such overreach has backfired on American companies.
In recent years, US politicians have clung to the misplaced belief that restricting exports of advanced goods and core technologies would slow the upgrading of China's tech industry and secure America's technological supremacy. Yet, they overestimated their leverage, while grossly underestimating the developmental resilience that China has built over decades of growth.
Today's China is no longer a passive follower or technology importer. Instead, it has grown into a robust innovation powerhouse with complete industrial chains and strong endogenous driving forces in numerous key technological sectors. Rather than stifling China's technological progress, America's escalating containment measures have only forced China to accelerate industrial upgrading and supply chain optimization.
In the meantime, while US politicians have been indulging in the illusion of building a "tech wall" through licensing restrictions, the self-inflicted damage to the US has grown increasingly impossible to ignore. Reuters reported in August 2025 that thousands of license applications by US companies to export goods and technology around the globe, including to China, were in limbo because turmoil at the agency in charge of approving them had left it nearly paralyzed.
The USCBC survey also listed license delays as the most common challenge identified by 95 percent of companies. For items bound for Chinese customers, two-thirds of companies have had licenses pending for at least three months, exceeding the US Commerce Department's statutory requirements to process applications within 90 days, and 31 percent have had licenses pending for one to two years.
As a result, American tech companies can only watch helplessly as orders that once belonged to them flow to suppliers in other countries. These licensing delays not only impose administrative costs far exceeding expectations, but also severely disrupt normal cross‑border commerce. From semiconductor components to high‑end industrial materials, and from aerospace ancillary products to cutting‑edge research instruments, countless routine trade transactions have been artificially severed. The market advantages that US firms took years to forge is being eroded by the very policies meant to protect them.
From a deeper economic perspective, the export licensing system is particularly lethal to America's innovation ecosystem. Usually, companies allocate a significant portion of their revenue to R&D and technological innovation. However, if the products resulting from these investments cannot be sold in a major market, investment returns will be affected, and the incentive for companies to continue investing in innovation will be undermined. As underscored by the USCBC survey, the export licensing regime diminishes America's ability to innovate and undermines US economic security.
In trying to contain China's industrial rise, the US has ended up undermining its own interests, laying bare the fundamental divide between two development paths. On one hand, the US attempts to fragment global industrial chains through administrative intervention, trade barriers and technological "decoupling" to sustain its dominant position. Yet, such obstructive practices only undermine the competitiveness of domestic industries and weaken America's own innovative vitality.
On the other side, China adheres to high-standard opening-up and win-win cooperation. By continuously opening its vast domestic market and providing foreign companies with a stable business environment, China has built a mutually beneficial global industrial collaboration network. China understands that genuine competitiveness comes from sustained independent innovation, sophisticated industrial supporting systems and market vitality. Precisely because China has chosen to expand openness and deepen cooperation, it has demonstrated remarkable resilience in the face of external containment and constructed a globally integrated supply network.
。 讯 近日，交通运输部印发《精品自驾旅游公路实施方案》（以下简称《实施方案》）。 《实施方案》明确，到2030年，部统筹推进的跨区域、长距离精品自驾旅游公路路线基本形成，优良路率高于平均水平，配套设施逐步完善，重点路段成为自驾出行知名目的地，初步实现网络化、体系化、品牌化发展。到2035年，“1+N”精品自驾旅游公路体系全面形成，设施服务持续提升，智慧安全保障有力，消费场景丰富多元，服务扩内需、促消费、惠民生的支撑作用更加显著。 《实施方案》提出，部统筹推进的精品自驾旅游公路以普通国道为主体，按照“总体骨架保持稳定、重要区域拓展支线、局部路段多元路径”的原则，通过有效串联国家文化公园、核心旅游资源、特色景观与人文风情等重要资源，形成总里程约6万公里的“三环、四横、五纵”精品自驾旅游公路主骨架。 《实施方案》明确，重点推进5方面任务、15项具体工作。在完善基础设施方面，以普通国道为骨架构建主次衔接的旅游公路网络，分类推进重点路段提质改造，逐步完善观景、安全等设施。在健全服务体系方面，完善交通枢纽租车及跨省运车网络，合理优化充电设施网络，拓展快修维护、户外装备租赁等延伸服务。在强化安全智慧方面，构建跨部门应急联动与数智化救援体系，推动交通、文旅等部门数据共享，系统分析自驾出行特征及需求。
二 | 在创新产品业态方面，丰富公路文化体验，推动“公路+”与露营、研学、赛事等业态融合，开发联票套票、停车接驳等特色产品。
三 | 在加强精细管理方面，健全政府主导、多方协同管理机制，探索灵活运营模式，加强路域环境治理与生态保护，打造精品自驾旅游公路品牌。版权申明：凡注有“”或电头为“”的稿件，均为独家版权所有，未经许可不得转载或镜像；授权转载必须注明来源为“”，并保留“”的电头。 。
Current article:http://hpf79.cuntoujuefourantapai.cfd/u41d/20260826/166325.html
Published on:14:06:13